Space Time and The Journey Through

Reality

What is “reality” if not a construct we take for granted? Psychology still has blind spots in understanding the brain. The best scientists and top neuro-surgeons can not even agree as to what "we" actually are.

 In 1935, the physicist Erwin Schrödinger invented a thought-experiment to test whether quantum theory fully describes reality. Known as “Schrödinger’s Cat,” the experiment asks us to imagine a cat in a sealed box, together with a vial containing poisonous gas and a mechanism that can shatter the vial. The mechanism is triggered when an unstable atomic nucleus decays, breaking the glass and killing the cat.

 Here and now at this moment (relative) it is the latest moment in time it has ever been. This is true for not only me, (now Dec. 5th 2020-2:10pm)

but for you reader. (apply your time)

I personally do not believe that outerspace is at all what they would have you believe.

Quantum mechanics vs common sense

Take a look at these three statements:

1. When someone observes an event happening, it really happened.

2. It is possible to make free choices, or at least, statistically random choices.

3. A choice made in one place can’t instantly affect a distant event. (Physicists call this “locality”.)

These are all intuitive ideas, and widely believed even by physicists. I found research, published in Nature Physics that shows they cannot all be true – or quantum mechanics itself must break down at some level.

This is the strongest result yet in a long series of discoveries in quantum mechanics that have upended mu ideas about reality. To understand why it’s so important, let’s look at this history.

The battle for reality

Quantum mechanics works extremely well to describe the behaviour of tiny objects, such as atoms or particles of light (photons). But that behaviour is … very odd.

In many cases, quantum theory doesn’t give definite answers to questions such as “where is this particle right now?” Instead, it only provides probabilities for where the particle might be found when it is observed.

For Niels Bohr, one of the founders of the theory a century ago, that’s not because of a lack of information, but because physical properties like “position” don’t actually exist until they are measured.

Now to address that gnawing question we all spend so much time on.

Can we travel much further into the future? Absolutely. If we could travel close to the speed of light, or in the proximity of a black hole, time would slow down enabling us to travel arbitrarily far into the future. The really interesting question is whether we can travel back into the past.

So then.

If we then argue that matter,  due to the infinite fuel to acceleration ratio or Tsiolkovsky Rocket Equation

(∆v=ve1n m0/me Ispg01n m0/mf)

(Let delta =v g0=gravity 1=natural logrithm)

will not traverse backwards,  does that rule out causality?

I say no.

Closed time-like curves

For the sake of discussion,  if information could be sent backwards to ones self through,... say web-hooks,  persistent servers and a quantum computational algorithm, I believe you could remember or recall both instances upon the realization that you were working towards something you had already done,  or will do. This would effectively cause a Closed Time Loop without the transference of matter or accelerating matter at c/ faster than light travel. This would demonstrate "spooky action at a distance" and also disprove the need for many worlds theory in avoidance of Temporal Paradoxes. 

Einstein’s general theory of relativity allows for the possibility of warping time to such a high degree that it actually folds upon itself, resulting in a time loop. Imagine you’re traveling along this loop; that means that at some point, you’d end up at a moment in the past and begin experiencing the same moments since, all over again – a bit like deja vu, except you wouldn’t realize it. Such constructs are often referred to as “closed time-like curves” or CTCs in the research literature, and popularly referred to as “time machines.” Time machines are a byproduct of effective faster-than-light travel schemes and understanding them can improve our understanding of how the universe works.

Blog Date

12/15/2020

Find Me On WordPress

12/22/2019

Wormhole Iniated 

12/21/2019

Web Node Model of Cloud Matrix

Computational Algorithm #1

Over the past few decades well-known physicists like Kip Thorne and Stephen Hawking produced seminal work on models related to time machines.

The general conclusion that has emerged from previous research, including Thorne’s and Hawking’s, is that nature forbids time loops. This is perhaps best explained in Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture, which essentially says that nature doesn’t allow for changes to its past history, thus sparing us from the paradoxes that can emerge if time travel were possible.

Perhaps the most well-known amongst these paradoxes that emerge due to time travel into the past is the so-called “grandfather paradox” in which a traveler goes back into the past and murders his own grandfather. This alters the course of history in a way that a contradiction emerges: The traveler was never born and therefore cannot exist. There have been many movie and novel plots based on the paradoxes that result from time travel – perhaps some of the most popular ones being the Back to the Future movies and Groundhog Day.

 

       Exotic matter

Depending on the details, different physical phenomena may intervene to prevent closed time-like curves from developing in physical systems. The most common is the requirement for a particular type of “exotic” matter that must be present in order for a time loop to exist. Loosely speaking, exotic matter is matter that has negative mass. The problem is negative mass is not known to exist in nature.

Here is some "read between the lines" new space news".

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/solar-system-superhighway-for-space-travel-214616795.html

Interstellar

https://www.facebook.com/aerosolassasin